lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201004151400.bb5b1aa84b08e45ea79b54e9@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Sun, 4 Oct 2020 15:14:00 +0200
From:   Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, raspl@...ux.ibm.com,
        ubraun@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net/smc: send ISM devices with unique chid
 in CLC proposal

On Sat, 03 Oct 2020 17:05:38 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:

> Series applied, but could you send a proper patch series in the future
> with a "[PATCH 0/N] ..." header posting?  It must explain what the
> patch series does at a high level, how it is doing it, and why it is
> doing it that way.
> 
> Thank you.

Hi Dave, not sure what went wrong but I sent the header posting along with
the patches, see https://lists.openwall.net/netdev/2020/10/02/197

-- 
Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ