[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKfmpSeSWNKEoxtYP9sY30wDUFaSAk76GghmBhTefLo07ThHiw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 18:59:41 -0400
From: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Thomas Davis <tadavis@....gov>, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 5/5] bonding: update Documentation for
port/bond terminology
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 2:14 PM Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Swap in port/bond terminology where appropriate, leaving all legacy sysfs
> and procfs interface mentions in place, but marked as deprecated.
> Additionally, add more netlink/iproute2 documentation, and note that this
> is the preferred method of interfacing with the bonding driver. While
> we're at it, also make some mention of NetworkManager's existence.
I neglected to update the ToC and put in some leading #'s that I
should have, so there will be at least one more revision of this set,
but would appreciate feedback on this version of the Documentation
update with respect to preservation of existing interface names,
explaining the changes, and deprecation.
--
Jarod Wilson
jarod@...hat.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists