[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9c6415e4-9d3b-2ba9-494a-c24316ec60c4@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 10:21:20 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Gregory Rose <gvrose8192@...il.com>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: net: Initialize return value in gro_cells_receive
On 10/6/20 8:53 PM, Gregory Rose wrote:
> The 'res' return value is uninitalized and may be returned with
> some random value. Initialize to NET_RX_DROP as the default
> return value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Rose <gvrose8192@...il.com>
>
> diff --git a/net/core/gro_cells.c b/net/core/gro_cells.c
> index e095fb871d91..4e835960db07 100644
> --- a/net/core/gro_cells.c
> +++ b/net/core/gro_cells.c
> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ int gro_cells_receive(struct gro_cells *gcells, struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> struct net_device *dev = skb->dev;
> struct gro_cell *cell;
> - int res;
> + int res = NET_RX_DROP;
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> if (unlikely(!(dev->flags & IFF_UP)))
I do not think this is needed.
Also, when/if sending a patch fixing a bug, we require a Fixes: tag.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists