lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 7 Oct 2020 18:40:22 -0700
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...dia.com>, stephen@...workplumber.org,
        jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, jiri@...nulli.us,
        ivecera@...hat.com, Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-next v2 2/2] tc: implement support for terse dump

On 9/30/20 9:59 AM, Vlad Buslov wrote:
> From: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
> 
> Implement support for classifier/action terse dump using new TCA_DUMP_FLAGS
> tlv with only available flag value TCA_DUMP_FLAGS_TERSE. Set the flag when
> user requested it with following example CLI (-br for 'brief'):
> 
>> tc -s -br filter show dev ens1f0 ingress
> 
> In terse mode dump only outputs essential data needed to identify the
> filter and action (handle, cookie, etc.) and stats, if requested by the
> user. The intention is to significantly improve rule dump rate by omitting
> all static data that do not change after rule is created.
> 

I really want to get agreement from other heavy tc users about what the
right information is for a brief mode.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ