netdev - Re: [PATCH] stating: octeon: Drop on uncorrectable alignment or FCS error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201009122459.GP1042@kadam>
Date:   Fri, 9 Oct 2020 15:24:59 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Alexander A Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...ia.com>
Cc:     devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] stating: octeon: Drop on uncorrectable alignment or FCS
 error

On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 11:46:05AM +0200, Alexander A Sverdlin wrote:
> --- a/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-rx.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-rx.c
> @@ -69,14 +69,16 @@ static inline int cvm_oct_check_rcv_error(struct cvmx_wqe *work)
>  	else
>  		port = work->word1.cn38xx.ipprt;
>  
> -	if ((work->word2.snoip.err_code == 10) && (work->word1.len <= 64)) {
> +	if ((work->word2.snoip.err_code == 10) && (work->word1.len <= 64))
>  		/*
>  		 * Ignore length errors on min size packets. Some
>  		 * equipment incorrectly pads packets to 64+4FCS
>  		 * instead of 60+4FCS.  Note these packets still get
>  		 * counted as frame errors.
>  		 */
> -	} else if (work->word2.snoip.err_code == 5 ||
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (work->word2.snoip.err_code == 5 ||
>  		   work->word2.snoip.err_code == 7) {

This line is indented to match the old code and it no longer matches.
(Please update the whitespace).

>  		/*
>  		 * We received a packet with either an alignment error

regards,
dan carpenter