netdev - Re: [PATCH iproute2-next v2 2/2] tc: implement support for terse dump

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87ft6n1tp8.fsf@buslov.dev>
Date:   Fri, 09 Oct 2020 15:15:31 +0300
From:   Vlad Buslov <vlad@...lov.dev>
To:     Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...dia.com>,
        stephen@...workplumber.org, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, jiri@...nulli.us,
        ivecera@...hat.com, Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-next v2 2/2] tc: implement support for terse dump


On Fri 09 Oct 2020 at 15:03, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> wrote:
> On 2020-10-08 11:34 a.m., Vlad Buslov wrote:
>>
>> On Thu 08 Oct 2020 at 15:58, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi Jamal,
>>
>> The existing terse dump tdc tests will have to be changed according with
>> new iproute2 tc syntax for brief(terse) output.
>>
>
> Which test(s)?
> I see for example d45e mentioning terse but i dont see corresponding
> code in the iproute2 tree i just pulled.

Yes. The tests d45e and 7c65 were added as a part of kernel series, but
corresponding iproute2 patches were never merged. Tests expect original
"terse flag" syntax of V1 iproute2 series and will have to be changed to
use -brief option instead.

>
> I feel like changing the tests this early may not be a big issue
> if they havent propagated in the wild.
>
> cheers,
> jamal