lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 12 Oct 2020 17:09:20 -0700
From:   Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
To:     <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, <kernel-team@...com>,
        Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
Subject: [PATCH net] net: fix pos incrementment in ipv6_route_seq_next

Commit 4fc427e05158 ("ipv6_route_seq_next should increase position index")
tried to fix the issue where seq_file pos is not increased
if a NULL element is returned with seq_ops->next(). See bug
  https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206283
The commit effectively does:
  - increase pos for all seq_ops->start()
  - increase pos for all seq_ops->next()

For ipv6_route, increasing pos for all seq_ops->next() is correct.
But increasing pos for seq_ops->start() is not correct
since pos is used to determine how many items to skip during
seq_ops->start():
  iter->skip = *pos;
seq_ops->start() just fetches the *current* pos item.
The item can be skipped only after seq_ops->show() which essentially
is the beginning of seq_ops->next().

For example, I have 7 ipv6 route entries,
  root@...h-fb-vm1:~/net-next dd if=/proc/net/ipv6_route bs=4096
  00000000000000000000000000000000 40 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000400 00000001 00000000 00000001     eth0
  fe800000000000000000000000000000 40 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000100 00000001 00000000 00000001     eth0
  00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 ffffffff 00000001 00000000 00200200       lo
  00000000000000000000000000000001 80 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000000 00000003 00000000 80200001       lo
  fe800000000000002050e3fffebd3be8 80 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000000 00000002 00000000 80200001     eth0
  ff000000000000000000000000000000 08 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000100 00000004 00000000 00000001     eth0
  00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 ffffffff 00000001 00000000 00200200       lo
  0+1 records in
  0+1 records out
  1050 bytes (1.0 kB, 1.0 KiB) copied, 0.00707908 s, 148 kB/s
  root@...h-fb-vm1:~/net-next

In the above, I specify buffer size 4096, so all records can be returned
to user space with a single trip to the kernel.

If I use buffer size 128, since each record size is 149, internally
kernel seq_read() will read 149 into its internal buffer and return the data
to user space in two read() syscalls. Then user read() syscall will trigger
next seq_ops->start(). Since the current implementation increased pos even
for seq_ops->start(), it will skip record #2, #4 and #6, assuming the first
record is #1.

  root@...h-fb-vm1:~/net-next dd if=/proc/net/ipv6_route bs=128
  00000000000000000000000000000000 40 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000400 00000001 00000000 00000001     eth0
  00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 ffffffff 00000001 00000000 00200200       lo
  fe800000000000002050e3fffebd3be8 80 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000000 00000002 00000000 80200001     eth0
  00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 ffffffff 00000001 00000000 00200200       lo
4+1 records in
4+1 records out
600 bytes copied, 0.00127758 s, 470 kB/s

To fix the problem, do not increase pos for seq_ops->start() and the
above `dd` command with `bs=128` will show correct result.

Fixes: 4fc427e05158 ("ipv6_route_seq_next should increase position index")
Cc: Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
---
 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c
index 141c0a4c569a..5aac5094bc41 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c
@@ -2582,10 +2582,10 @@ static void *ipv6_route_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos)
 	struct net *net = seq_file_net(seq);
 	struct ipv6_route_iter *iter = seq->private;
 
-	++(*pos);
 	if (!v)
 		goto iter_table;
 
+	++(*pos);
 	n = rcu_dereference_bh(((struct fib6_info *)v)->fib6_next);
 	if (n)
 		return n;
-- 
2.24.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists