[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201020155559.69c5389e@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 15:55:59 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Vincent Bernat <vincent@...nat.ch>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1] net: evaluate
net.conf.ipvX.all.ignore_routes_with_linkdown
On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 08:20:43 +0200 Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 19 octobre 2020 17:53 -07, Jakub Kicinski:
> > I'm not hearing any objections, but I have two questions:
> > - do you intend to merge it for 5.10 or 5.11? Because it has a fixes
> > tag, yet it's marked for net-next. If we put it in 5.10 it may get
> > pulled into stable immediately, knowing how things work lately.
>
> I have never been super-familiar with net/net-next. I am always using
> net-next and let people sort it out.
Since there is some breakage potential I'd prefer to merge this change
into net-next and give it more testing. But net-next is currently
closed (don't pay attention to the graphic at vger).
If you wouldn't mind - please repost next week.
You can split out and repost the documentation change separately if you
want, that's a fix that can go into net right away.
> > - we have other sysctls that use IN_DEV_CONF_GET(), e.g.
> > "proxy_arp_pvlan" should those also be converted?
>
> I can check them and do that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists