netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v1] net: evaluate net.conf.ipvX.all.ignore_routes_with

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 20 Oct 2020 15:55:59 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Vincent Bernat <vincent@...nat.ch>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1] net: evaluate
 net.conf.ipvX.all.ignore_routes_with_linkdown

On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 08:20:43 +0200 Vincent Bernat wrote:
>  ❦ 19 octobre 2020 17:53 -07, Jakub Kicinski:
> > I'm not hearing any objections, but I have two questions:
> >  - do you intend to merge it for 5.10 or 5.11? Because it has a fixes
> >    tag, yet it's marked for net-next. If we put it in 5.10 it may get
> >    pulled into stable immediately, knowing how things work lately.  
> 
> I have never been super-familiar with net/net-next. I am always using
> net-next and let people sort it out.

Since there is some breakage potential I'd prefer to merge this change
into net-next and give it more testing. But net-next is currently
closed (don't pay attention to the graphic at vger).

If you wouldn't mind - please repost next week.

You can split out and repost the documentation change separately if you
want, that's a fix that can go into net right away.

> >  - we have other sysctls that use IN_DEV_CONF_GET(), e.g.
> > "proxy_arp_pvlan" should those also be converted?  
> 
> I can check them and do that.