netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v1] net: evaluate net.conf.ipvX.all.ignore_routes_with

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <m34kmp8ll0.fsf@bernat.ch>
Date:   Tue, 20 Oct 2020 08:20:43 +0200
From:   Vincent Bernat <vincent@...nat.ch>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1] net: evaluate
 net.conf.ipvX.all.ignore_routes_with_linkdown

 ❦ 19 octobre 2020 17:53 -07, Jakub Kicinski:

> I'm not hearing any objections, but I have two questions:
>  - do you intend to merge it for 5.10 or 5.11? Because it has a fixes
>    tag, yet it's marked for net-next. If we put it in 5.10 it may get
>    pulled into stable immediately, knowing how things work lately.

I have never been super-familiar with net/net-next. I am always using
net-next and let people sort it out.

>  - we have other sysctls that use IN_DEV_CONF_GET(), e.g.
> "proxy_arp_pvlan" should those also be converted?

I can check them and do that.
-- 
Use library functions.
            - The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plauger)