netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH v1 3/6] net: phy: add CAN interface mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201023202423.GD752111@lunn.ch>
Date:   Fri, 23 Oct 2020 22:24:23 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
        David Jander <david@...tonic.nl>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, mkl@...gutronix.de,
        Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 3/6] net: phy: add CAN interface mode

On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 12:56:23PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
> ---
>  drivers/net/phy/phy.c | 2 ++
>  include/linux/phy.h   | 3 +++
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
> index 35525a671400..4fb355df3e61 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
> @@ -324,6 +324,8 @@ void phy_ethtool_ksettings_get(struct phy_device *phydev,
>  	cmd->base.master_slave_state = phydev->master_slave_state;
>  	if (phydev->interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_MOCA)
>  		cmd->base.port = PORT_BNC;
> +	else if (phydev->interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_CAN)
> +		cmd->base.port = PORT_OTHER;
>  	else
>  		cmd->base.port = PORT_MII;

There is nothing stopping you from adding CAN specific PORT_ types.

      Andrew