[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201029143934.GO878328@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 15:39:34 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>,
Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@...aro.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Steve McIntyre <steve@...val.com>,
"open list:BPF JIT for MIPS (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Willy Liu <willy.liu@...ltek.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Masahisa Kojima <masahisa.kojima@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: realtek PHY commit bbc4d71d63549 causes regression
> What about reverting the realtek PHY commit from stable?
> As Ard said it doesn't really fix anything (usage wise) and causes a bunch of
> problems.
>
> If I understand correctly we have 3 options:
> 1. 'Hack' the drivers in stable to fix it (and most of those hacks will take
> a long time to remove)
> 2. Update DTE of all affected devices, backport it to stable and force users to
> update
> 3. Revert the PHY commit
>
> imho [3] is the least painful solution.
The PHY commit is correct, in that it fixes a bug. So i don't want to
remove it.
Backporting it to stable is what is causing most of the issues today,
combined with a number of broken DT descriptions. So i would be happy
for stable to get a patch which looks at the strapping, sees ID is
enabled via strapping, warns the DT blob is FUBAR, and then ignores
the requested PHY-mode. That gives developers time to fix their broken
DT.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists