[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2264563a-fa9e-11b0-2c42-31bc6b8e2790@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 18:56:06 +0100
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Realtek linux nic maintainers <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] r8169: remove unneeded memory barrier in rtl_tx
tp->dirty_tx isn't changed outside rtl_tx(). Therefore I see no need
to guarantee a specific order of reading tp->dirty_tx and tp->cur_tx.
Having said that we can remove the memory barrier.
In addition use READ_ONCE() when reading tp->cur_tx because it can
change in parallel to rtl_tx().
Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
index b6c11aaa5..75df476c6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
@@ -4364,9 +4364,8 @@ static void rtl_tx(struct net_device *dev, struct rtl8169_private *tp,
unsigned int dirty_tx, tx_left, bytes_compl = 0, pkts_compl = 0;
dirty_tx = tp->dirty_tx;
- smp_rmb();
- for (tx_left = tp->cur_tx - dirty_tx; tx_left > 0; tx_left--) {
+ for (tx_left = READ_ONCE(tp->cur_tx) - dirty_tx; tx_left; tx_left--) {
unsigned int entry = dirty_tx % NUM_TX_DESC;
struct sk_buff *skb = tp->tx_skb[entry].skb;
u32 status;
--
2.29.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists