[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <63365b7e683e2c3b1b8e41c51668b401@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 13:56:09 -0800
From: drt <drt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Lijun Pan <ljp@...ux.ibm.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
sukadev@...ux.ibm.com, drt@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ibmvnic: merge do_change_param_reset into
do_reset
On 2020-11-03 15:09, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Oct 2020 04:46:45 -0500 Lijun Pan wrote:
>> Commit b27507bb59ed ("net/ibmvnic: unlock rtnl_lock in reset so
>> linkwatch_event can run") introduced do_change_param_reset function to
>> solve the rtnl lock issue. Majority of the code in
>> do_change_param_reset
>> duplicates do_reset. Also, we can handle the rtnl lock issue in
>> do_reset
>> itself. Hence merge do_change_param_reset back into do_reset to clean
>> up
>> the code.
>>
>> Fixes: b27507bb59ed ("net/ibmvnic: unlock rtnl_lock in reset so
>> linkwatch_event can run")
>> Signed-off-by: Lijun Pan <ljp@...ux.ibm.com>
>
> Applied, thanks!
Hi Jakub,
Thank you for applying this patch so promptly. However, I would like to
ask that this patch be withdrawn.
1. It needs more time in testing.
2. There are a number of bug fix patches being tested. This patch would
require rework of those patches.
3. As the lead maintainer for ibmvnic, I failed to communicate this to
Lijun. I will do better going forward.
Please revert this commit. We will resubmit this patch later.
I sincerely apologize for any trouble this may have caused.
Regards,
Dany
Powered by blists - more mailing lists