[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201105124329.GA1287772@shredder>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 14:43:29 +0200
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
To: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, kuba@...nel.org, mlxsw@...dia.com,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH ethtool] ethtool: Improve compatibility between
netlink and ioctl interfaces
On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 12:05:18PM +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 12:55:01AM +0100, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 04:24:30PM +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > >
> > > I have the changes you requested here:
> > > https://github.com/idosch/ethtool/commit/b34d15839f2662808c566c04eda726113e20ee59
> > >
> > > Do you want to integrate it with your nl_parse() rework or should I?
> >
> > I pushed the combined series to
> >
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mkubecek/ethtool.git
> >
> > as branch mk/master/advertise-all. I only ran few quick tests so far,
> > it's not submission ready yet.
> >
> > First two patches are unrelated fixes found while testing, I'm going to
> > submit and push them separately. Third patch reworks nl_parser()
> > handling of multiple request messages as indicated in my previous mail.
> > Fourth patch is the ioctl compatibility fix.
>
> Great, thank you. I pushed the patches to our regression. Will go over
> the results tomorrow and let you know.
Looks OK. Thanks again.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists