[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpUn2v94cUeE9MmK2__Hsf+rumq-cRNrnRN2iyUn1M1hug@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 22:34:27 -0800
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Vlad Buslov <vlad@...lov.dev>, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: sched: implement action-specific terse dump
On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 4:39 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 22:12:43 +0200 Vlad Buslov wrote:
> > Allow user to request action terse dump with new flag value
> > TCA_FLAG_TERSE_DUMP. Only output essential action info in terse dump (kind,
> > stats, index and cookie, if set by the user when creating the action). This
> > is different from filter terse dump where index is excluded (filter can be
> > identified by its own handle).
> >
> > Move tcf_action_dump_terse() function to the beginning of source file in
> > order to call it from tcf_dump_walker().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vlad Buslov <vlad@...lov.dev>
> > Suggested-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
>
> Jiri, Cong, can I get an ack?
>
> The previous terse dump made sense because it fulfilled the need of
> an important user (OvS). IDK if this is as clear-cut, and I haven't
> followed the iproute2 thread closely enough, so please weigh in.
Like I said in the previous discussion, I am not a fan of terse dump,
but before we have a better solution here, using this flag is probably
the best we have on the table, so at least for a temporary solution:
Acked-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists