netdev - Re: [PATCH v10 1/2] bus: mhi: Add mhi_queue_is

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 6 Nov 2020 08:04:45 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Cc:     Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        bbhatt@...eaurora.org, willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com,
        jhugo@...eaurora.org, hemantk@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/2] bus: mhi: Add mhi_queue_is_full function

On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 10:43:53 +0530 Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 04:57:08PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Tue,  3 Nov 2020 18:23:53 +0100 Loic Poulain wrote:  
> > > This function can be used by client driver to determine whether it's
> > > possible to queue new elements in a channel ring.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>  
> > 
> > Applied.  
> 
> Oops. I should've mentioned this (my bad) that we should use an immutable
> branch to take this change. Because, there are changes going to get merged
> into the MHI tree which will introduce merge conflicts. And moreover, we
> planned to have an immutable branch to handle a similar case with ath11k.

Damn, sorry.

> Since you've applied now, what would you propose?

Do you need mhi_queue_is_full() in other branches, or are you just
concerned about the conflicts?

I'm assuming the concern is just about the mhi/core patch, or would 
you need to refactor something in the net driver as well?