netdev - Re: [PATCH v10 1/2] bus: mhi: Add mhi_queue_is

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 6 Nov 2020 10:43:53 +0530
From:   Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        bbhatt@...eaurora.org, willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com,
        jhugo@...eaurora.org, hemantk@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/2] bus: mhi: Add mhi_queue_is_full function

On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 04:57:08PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue,  3 Nov 2020 18:23:53 +0100 Loic Poulain wrote:
> > This function can be used by client driver to determine whether it's
> > possible to queue new elements in a channel ring.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
> 
> Applied.

Oops. I should've mentioned this (my bad) that we should use an immutable
branch to take this change. Because, there are changes going to get merged
into the MHI tree which will introduce merge conflicts. And moreover, we
planned to have an immutable branch to handle a similar case with ath11k.

Since you've applied now, what would you propose?

Thanks,
Mani