[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y2jd5dyl.fsf@tynnyri.adurom.net>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2020 18:28:02 +0200
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@...ltek.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"\<netdev\@vger.kernel.org\>" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 41/41] realtek: rtw88: pci: Add prototypes for .probe, .remove and .shutdown
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> writes:
> On Mon, 02 Nov 2020, Brian Norris wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 3:25 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
>> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/pci.h
>> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/pci.h
>> > @@ -212,6 +212,10 @@ struct rtw_pci {
>> > void __iomem *mmap;
>> > };
>> >
>> > +int rtw_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id);
>> > +void rtw_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev);
>> > +void rtw_pci_shutdown(struct pci_dev *pdev);
>> > +
>> >
>>
>> These definitions are already in 4 other header files:
>>
>> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8723de.h
>> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8821ce.h
>> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822be.h
>> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822ce.h
>>
>> Seems like you should be moving them, not just adding yet another duplicate.
>
> I followed the current convention.
>
> Happy to optimise if that's what is required.
I agree with Brian, these and rtw_pm_ops should be moved to pci.h to
avoid code duplication.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Powered by blists - more mailing lists