lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y2jd5dyl.fsf@tynnyri.adurom.net>
Date:   Sat, 07 Nov 2020 18:28:02 +0200
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@...ltek.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        "\<netdev\@vger.kernel.org\>" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 41/41] realtek: rtw88: pci: Add prototypes for .probe, .remove and .shutdown

Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> writes:

> On Mon, 02 Nov 2020, Brian Norris wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 3:25 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
>> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/pci.h
>> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/pci.h
>> > @@ -212,6 +212,10 @@ struct rtw_pci {
>> >         void __iomem *mmap;
>> >  };
>> >
>> > +int rtw_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id);
>> > +void rtw_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev);
>> > +void rtw_pci_shutdown(struct pci_dev *pdev);
>> > +
>> >
>> 
>> These definitions are already in 4 other header files:
>> 
>> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8723de.h
>> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8821ce.h
>> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822be.h
>> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822ce.h
>> 
>> Seems like you should be moving them, not just adding yet another duplicate.
>
> I followed the current convention.
>
> Happy to optimise if that's what is required.

I agree with Brian, these and rtw_pm_ops should be moved to pci.h to
avoid code duplication.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ