lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201107184252.GT2063125@dell>
Date:   Sat, 7 Nov 2020 18:42:52 +0000
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
        Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@...ltek.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        "<netdev@...r.kernel.org>" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 41/41] realtek: rtw88: pci: Add prototypes for .probe,
 .remove and .shutdown

On Sat, 07 Nov 2020, Kalle Valo wrote:

> Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> writes:
> 
> > On Mon, 02 Nov 2020, Brian Norris wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 3:25 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> >> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/pci.h
> >> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/pci.h
> >> > @@ -212,6 +212,10 @@ struct rtw_pci {
> >> >         void __iomem *mmap;
> >> >  };
> >> >
> >> > +int rtw_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id);
> >> > +void rtw_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> >> > +void rtw_pci_shutdown(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> >> > +
> >> >
> >> 
> >> These definitions are already in 4 other header files:
> >> 
> >> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8723de.h
> >> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8821ce.h
> >> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822be.h
> >> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822ce.h
> >> 
> >> Seems like you should be moving them, not just adding yet another duplicate.
> >
> > I followed the current convention.
> >
> > Happy to optimise if that's what is required.
> 
> I agree with Brian, these and rtw_pm_ops should be moved to pci.h to
> avoid code duplication.

Will do, thanks.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ