netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v1] net: phy: spi_ks8995: Do not overwrite SPI mode flags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201109143605.0a60b2ab@kicinski-fedora-PC1C0HJN.hsd1.ca.comcast.net>
Date:   Mon, 9 Nov 2020 14:36:05 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1] net: phy: spi_ks8995: Do not overwrite SPI
 mode flags

On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 17:27:28 -0500 Sven Van Asbroeck wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 5:23 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Is it only broken for you in linux-next or just in the current 5.10
> > release?  
> 
> It's broken for me in the current 5.10 release. That means it should
> go to net, not net-next, correct?

Yes, most certainly. Especially with 5.10 being LTS.

You can send a minimal fix (perhaps what you got already?), and follow
up with the helper as suggested by Andrew after ~a week when net is
merged into net-next.

But please at least repost for net and CC Mark and the SPI list for
input.