netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v1] net: phy: spi_ks8995: Do not overwrite SPI mode flags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGngYiWYKsTURi0pRMxX=SjzPnx-OF0cC43dnaGc+o15kLwk_A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 9 Nov 2020 17:39:22 -0500
From:   Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1] net: phy: spi_ks8995: Do not overwrite SPI
 mode flags

On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 5:36 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Yes, most certainly. Especially with 5.10 being LTS.
>
> You can send a minimal fix (perhaps what you got already?), and follow
> up with the helper as suggested by Andrew after ~a week when net is
> merged into net-next.
>

What I already posted (as v1) should be the minimal fix.
Can we proceed on that basis? I'll follow up with the helper
after the net -> net-next merge, as you suggested.