netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 01/34] mm: memcontrol: use helpers to read page's memcg data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201113095632.489e66e2@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Fri, 13 Nov 2020 09:56:32 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Cc:     <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@...com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 01/34] mm: memcontrol: use helpers to read
 page's memcg data

Hi Roman,

On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 14:15:10 -0800 Roman Gushchin <guro@...com> wrote:
>
> Patch series "mm: allow mapping accounted kernel pages to userspace", v6.
> 
> Currently a non-slab kernel page which has been charged to a memory cgroup
> can't be mapped to userspace.  The underlying reason is simple: PageKmemcg
> flag is defined as a page type (like buddy, offline, etc), so it takes a
> bit from a page->mapped counter.  Pages with a type set can't be mapped to
> userspace.
>
.....
> 
> To make sure nobody uses a direct access, struct page's
> mem_cgroup/obj_cgroups is converted to unsigned long memcg_data.
> 
> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201027001657.3398190-1-guro@fb.com
> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201027001657.3398190-2-guro@fb.com
> Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>

What is going on here?  You are taking patches from linux-next and
submitting them to another maintainer?  Why?

You should not do that from Andrew's tree as it changes/rebases every
so often ... and you should not have my SOB on there as it is only
there because that patch is in linux-next i.e. I in the submission
chain to linux-next - if the patch is to go via some other tree, then
my SOB should not be there.  (The same may be true for Andrew's SOB.)
In general you cannot add someone else's SOB to one of your patch
submissions.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped