| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20201113020653.088fd559cfc2a35c45b84e4c@uniroma2.it>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 02:06:53 +0100
From: Andrea Mayer <andrea.mayer@...roma2.it>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Shrijeet Mukherjee <shrijeet@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Stefano Salsano <stefano.salsano@...roma2.it>,
Paolo Lungaroni <paolo.lungaroni@...t.it>,
Ahmed Abdelsalam <ahabdels.dev@...il.com>,
Andrea Mayer <andrea.mayer@...roma2.it>
Subject: Re: [net-next,v2,3/5] seg6: add callbacks for customizing the
creation/destruction of a behavior
Hi Jakub,
many thanks for your review. Please see my responses inline:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 14:56:55 -0800
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Nov 2020 16:31:37 +0100 Andrea Mayer wrote:
> > We introduce two callbacks used for customizing the creation/destruction of
> > a SRv6 behavior. Such callbacks are defined in the new struct
> > seg6_local_lwtunnel_ops and hereafter we provide a brief description of
> > them:
> >
> > - build_state(...): used for calling the custom constructor of the
> > behavior during its initialization phase and after all the attributes
> > have been parsed successfully;
> >
> > - destroy_state(...): used for calling the custom destructor of the
> > behavior before it is completely destroyed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrea Mayer <andrea.mayer@...roma2.it>
>
> Looks good, minor nits.
>
> > diff --git a/net/ipv6/seg6_local.c b/net/ipv6/seg6_local.c
> > index 63a82e2fdea9..4b0f155d641d 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv6/seg6_local.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv6/seg6_local.c
> > @@ -33,11 +33,23 @@
> >
> > struct seg6_local_lwt;
> >
> > +typedef int (*slwt_build_state_t)(struct seg6_local_lwt *slwt, const void *cfg,
> > + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
> > +typedef void (*slwt_destroy_state_t)(struct seg6_local_lwt *slwt);
>
> Let's avoid the typedefs. Instead of taking a pointer to the op take a
> pointer to the ops struct in seg6_local_lwtunnel_build_state() etc.
>
Ok, I will do it this way in v3.
> > +/* callbacks used for customizing the creation and destruction of a behavior */
> > +struct seg6_local_lwtunnel_ops {
> > + slwt_build_state_t build_state;
> > + slwt_destroy_state_t destroy_state;
> > +};
> > +
> > struct seg6_action_desc {
> > int action;
> > unsigned long attrs;
> > int (*input)(struct sk_buff *skb, struct seg6_local_lwt *slwt);
> > int static_headroom;
> > +
> > + struct seg6_local_lwtunnel_ops slwt_ops;
> > };
> >
> > struct bpf_lwt_prog {
> > @@ -1015,6 +1027,45 @@ static void destroy_attrs(struct seg6_local_lwt *slwt)
> > __destroy_attrs(attrs, 0, SEG6_LOCAL_MAX + 1, slwt);
> > }
> >
> > +/* call the custom constructor of the behavior during its initialization phase
> > + * and after that all its attributes have been parsed successfully.
> > + */
> > +static int
> > +seg6_local_lwtunnel_build_state(struct seg6_local_lwt *slwt, const void *cfg,
> > + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> > +{
> > + slwt_build_state_t build_func;
> > + struct seg6_action_desc *desc;
> > + int err = 0;
> > +
> > + desc = slwt->desc;
> > + if (!desc)
> > + return -EINVAL;
>
> This is impossible, right?
>
Yes, it is. I will remove this check in v3.
> > +
> > + build_func = desc->slwt_ops.build_state;
> > + if (build_func)
> > + err = build_func(slwt, cfg, extack);
> > +
> > + return err;
>
> no need for err, just use return directly.
>
> if (!ops->build_state)
> return 0;
> return ops->build_state(...);
>
Ok, I will do it in this way in v3.
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* call the custom destructor of the behavior which is invoked before the
> > + * tunnel is going to be destroyed.
> > + */
> > +static void seg6_local_lwtunnel_destroy_state(struct seg6_local_lwt *slwt)
> > +{
> > + slwt_destroy_state_t destroy_func;
> > + struct seg6_action_desc *desc;
> > +
> > + desc = slwt->desc;
> > + if (!desc)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + destroy_func = desc->slwt_ops.destroy_state;
> > + if (destroy_func)
> > + destroy_func(slwt);
> > +}
> > +
> > static int parse_nla_action(struct nlattr **attrs, struct seg6_local_lwt *slwt)
> > {
> > struct seg6_action_param *param;
> > @@ -1090,8 +1141,16 @@ static int seg6_local_build_state(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
> >
> > err = parse_nla_action(tb, slwt);
> > if (err < 0)
> > + /* In case of error, the parse_nla_action() takes care of
> > + * releasing resources which have been acquired during the
> > + * processing of attributes.
> > + */
>
> that's the normal behavior for a kernel function, comment is
> unnecessary IMO
>
Yes and this is the way it should be. But before this patch, the
parse_nla_action() in case of error did not always release all the acquired
resources. From this patcheset onward, the parse_nla_action() behaves like we
expect. Therefore, I will remove the comment in v3.
> > goto out_free;
> >
> > + err = seg6_local_lwtunnel_build_state(slwt, cfg, extack);
> > + if (err < 0)
> > + goto free_attrs;
>
> The function is called destroy_attrs, call the label out_destroy_attrs,
> or err_destroy_attrs.
>
Fine, I will stick with the out_destroy_attrs to be consistent and uniform with
the out_free label in v3.
> > newts->type = LWTUNNEL_ENCAP_SEG6_LOCAL;
> > newts->flags = LWTUNNEL_STATE_INPUT_REDIRECT;
> > newts->headroom = slwt->headroom;
> > @@ -1100,6 +1159,9 @@ static int seg6_local_build_state(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
> >
> > return 0;
> >
> > +free_attrs:
> > + destroy_attrs(slwt);
> > +
>
> no need for empty lines on error paths
>
Ok.
> > out_free:
> > kfree(newts);
> > return err;
> > @@ -1109,6 +1171,8 @@ static void seg6_local_destroy_state(struct lwtunnel_state *lwt)
> > {
> > struct seg6_local_lwt *slwt = seg6_local_lwtunnel(lwt);
> >
> > + seg6_local_lwtunnel_destroy_state(slwt);
> > +
> > destroy_attrs(slwt);
> >
> > return;
>
Thank you,
Andrea
Powered by blists - more mailing lists