netdev - Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Fix inefficiences and rename nla

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 16 Nov 2020 09:32:43 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Francis Laniel <laniel_francis@...vacyrequired.com>
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Fix inefficiences and rename nla_strlcpy

On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 18:06:33 +0100 Francis Laniel wrote:
> Le lundi 16 novembre 2020, 17:06:52 CET Jakub Kicinski a écrit :
> > On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 18:05:39 +0100 Francis Laniel wrote:  
> > > Le dimanche 15 novembre 2020, 01:18:37 CET Jakub Kicinski a écrit :  
> > > > On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 10:56:26 -0800 Kees Cook wrote:  
> > > > > Thanks! This looks good to me.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Jakub, does this look ready to you?  
> > > > 
> > > > Yup, looks good, sorry!
> > > > 
> > > > But it didn't get into patchwork cleanly :/
> > > > 
> > > > One more resend please? (assuming we're expected to take this
> > > > into net-next)  
> > > 
> > > I will send it again and tag it for net-next.
> > > 
> > > Just to know, is patchwork this:
> > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/  
> > 
> > Yes, that's the one.  
> 
> OK! The tool seems cool.
> 
> So normally I resend the patches, but I do not see them in patchwork.
> Is there something am I supposed to do so they can be visible through 
> patchwork?

They were visible, this is your resend:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=384457&state=*

(note the * at the end, sometimes it gets stripped when clicking on a
link)

Maybe you checked after I already applied them, patches which had been
"handled" (aka "Action required=no") are not displayed by default.