netdev - Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Fix inefficiences and rename nla

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3073458.2cBt0YhbhG@machine>
Date:   Mon, 16 Nov 2020 19:18:27 +0100
From:   Francis Laniel <laniel_francis@...vacyrequired.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Fix inefficiences and rename nla_strlcpy

Le lundi 16 novembre 2020, 18:32:43 CET Jakub Kicinski a écrit :
> On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 18:06:33 +0100 Francis Laniel wrote:
> > Le lundi 16 novembre 2020, 17:06:52 CET Jakub Kicinski a écrit :
> > > On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 18:05:39 +0100 Francis Laniel wrote:
> > > > Le dimanche 15 novembre 2020, 01:18:37 CET Jakub Kicinski a écrit :
> > > > > On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 10:56:26 -0800 Kees Cook wrote:
> > > > > > Thanks! This looks good to me.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Jakub, does this look ready to you?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Yup, looks good, sorry!
> > > > > 
> > > > > But it didn't get into patchwork cleanly :/
> > > > > 
> > > > > One more resend please? (assuming we're expected to take this
> > > > > into net-next)
> > > > 
> > > > I will send it again and tag it for net-next.
> > > > 
> > > > Just to know, is patchwork this:
> > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/
> > > 
> > > Yes, that's the one.
> > 
> > OK! The tool seems cool.
> > 
> > So normally I resend the patches, but I do not see them in patchwork.
> > Is there something am I supposed to do so they can be visible through
> > patchwork?
> 
> They were visible, this is your resend:
> 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=384457&state=*
> 
> (note the * at the end, sometimes it gets stripped when clicking on a
> link)
> 
> Maybe you checked after I already applied them, patches which had been
> "handled" (aka "Action required=no") are not displayed by default.

Working of patchwork is now clearer for me, thank you!
But yes I think I checked after you applied them.