netdev - [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Fix the irq and nmi check in bpf_sk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201116200113.2868539-1-kafai@fb.com>
Date:   Mon, 16 Nov 2020 12:01:13 -0800
From:   Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
To:     <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, <kernel-team@...com>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Fix the irq and nmi check in bpf_sk_storage for tracing usage

The intention of the current check is to avoid using bpf_sk_storage
in irq and nmi.  Jakub pointed out that the current check cannot
do that.  For example, in_serving_softirq() returns true
if the softirq handling is interrupted by hard irq.

Fixes: 8e4597c627fb ("bpf: Allow using bpf_sk_storage in FENTRY/FEXIT/RAW_TP")
Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
---
 net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c b/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
index 359908a7d3c1..a32037daa933 100644
--- a/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
+++ b/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
@@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ static bool bpf_sk_storage_tracing_allowed(const struct bpf_prog *prog)
 BPF_CALL_4(bpf_sk_storage_get_tracing, struct bpf_map *, map, struct sock *, sk,
 	   void *, value, u64, flags)
 {
-	if (!in_serving_softirq() && !in_task())
+	if (in_irq() || in_nmi())
 		return (unsigned long)NULL;
 
 	return (unsigned long)____bpf_sk_storage_get(map, sk, value, flags);
@@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ BPF_CALL_4(bpf_sk_storage_get_tracing, struct bpf_map *, map, struct sock *, sk,
 BPF_CALL_2(bpf_sk_storage_delete_tracing, struct bpf_map *, map,
 	   struct sock *, sk)
 {
-	if (!in_serving_softirq() && !in_task())
+	if (in_irq() || in_nmi())
 		return -EPERM;
 
 	return ____bpf_sk_storage_delete(map, sk);
-- 
2.24.1