netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Fix the irq and nmi check in bpf_sk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <160557480494.19963.4345087543810572466.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 17 Nov 2020 01:00:04 +0000
From:   patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To:     Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Cc:     bpf@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
        kuba@...nel.org, kernel-team@...com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Fix the irq and nmi check in bpf_sk_storage for
 tracing usage

Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (refs/heads/master):

On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 12:01:13 -0800 you wrote:
> The intention of the current check is to avoid using bpf_sk_storage
> in irq and nmi.  Jakub pointed out that the current check cannot
> do that.  For example, in_serving_softirq() returns true
> if the softirq handling is interrupted by hard irq.
> 
> Fixes: 8e4597c627fb ("bpf: Allow using bpf_sk_storage in FENTRY/FEXIT/RAW_TP")
> Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next] bpf: Fix the irq and nmi check in bpf_sk_storage for tracing usage
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/b93ef089d35c

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html