netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 00/13] Add mlx5 subfunction support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201116145226.27b30b1f@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Mon, 16 Nov 2020 14:52:26 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>
Cc:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <jiri@...dia.com>, <jgg@...dia.com>,
        <dledford@...hat.com>, <leonro@...dia.com>, <saeedm@...dia.com>,
        <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/13] Add mlx5 subfunction support

On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 21:24:10 +0200 Parav Pandit wrote:
> This series introduces support for mlx5 subfunction (SF).
> A subfunction is a portion of a PCI device that supports multiple
> classes of devices such as netdev, RDMA and more.
> 
> This patchset is based on Leon's series [3].
> It is a third user of proposed auxiliary bus [4].
> 
> Subfunction support is discussed in detail in RFC [1] and [2].
> RFC [1] and extension [2] describes requirements, design, and proposed
> plumbing using devlink, auxiliary bus and sysfs for systemd/udev
> support.

So we're going to have two ways of adding subdevs? Via devlink and via
the new vdpa netlink thing?

Question number two - is this supposed to be ready to be applied to
net-next? It seems there is a conflict.

Also could you please wrap your code at 80 chars?

Thanks.