netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next,v3 0/9] netfilter: flowtable bridge and vlan enhancements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201116225658.GA7247@salvia>
Date:   Mon, 16 Nov 2020 23:56:58 +0100
From:   Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>,
        netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, razor@...ckwall.org, jeremy@...zel.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next,v3 0/9] netfilter: flowtable bridge and vlan
 enhancements

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 02:45:21PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 23:36:15 +0100 Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > > Are you saying A -> B traffic won't match so it will update the cache,
> > > since conntrack flows are bi-directional?  
> > 
> > Yes, Traffic for A -> B won't match the flowtable entry, this will
> > update the cache.
> 
> That's assuming there will be A -> B traffic without B sending a
> request which reaches A, first.

B might send packets to A but this will not get anywhere. Assuming
TCP, this will trigger retransmissions so B -> A will kick in to
refresh the entry.

Is this scenario that you describe a showstopper?

Thank you.