netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/5] selftests/bpf: xsk selftests framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPLEeBYnYcWALN_JMBtZWt3uDnpYNtCA_HVLN6Gi7VbVk022xw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 26 Nov 2020 21:22:42 +0000
From:   Weqaar Janjua <weqaar.janjua@...il.com>
To:     Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>
Cc:     Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        ast@...nel.org, Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...il.com>,
        Weqaar Janjua <weqaar.a.janjua@...el.com>, shuah@...nel.org,
        skhan@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>,
        jonathan.lemon@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/5] selftests/bpf: xsk selftests framework

On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 at 09:01, Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com> wrote:
>
> On 2020-11-26 07:44, Yonghong Song wrote:
> >
> [...]
> >
> > What other configures I am missing?
> >
> > BTW, I cherry-picked the following pick from bpf tree in this experiment.
> >    commit e7f4a5919bf66e530e08ff352d9b78ed89574e6b (HEAD -> xsk)
> >    Author: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>
> >    Date:   Mon Nov 23 18:56:00 2020 +0100
> >
> >        net, xsk: Avoid taking multiple skbuff references
> >
>
> Hmm, I'm getting an oops, unless I cherry-pick:
>
> 36ccdf85829a ("net, xsk: Avoid taking multiple skbuff references")
>
> *AND*
>
> 537cf4e3cc2f ("xsk: Fix umem cleanup bug at socket destruct")
>
> from bpf/master.
>

Same as Bjorn's findings ^^^, additionally applying the second patch
537cf4e3cc2f [PASS] all tests for me

PREREQUISITES: [ PASS ]
SKB NOPOLL: [ PASS ]
SKB POLL: [ PASS ]
DRV NOPOLL: [ PASS ]
DRV POLL: [ PASS ]
SKB SOCKET TEARDOWN: [ PASS ]
DRV SOCKET TEARDOWN: [ PASS ]
SKB BIDIRECTIONAL SOCKETS: [ PASS ]
DRV BIDIRECTIONAL SOCKETS: [ PASS ]

With the first patch alone, as soon as we enter DRV/Native NOPOLL mode
kernel panics, whereas in your case NOPOLL tests were falling with
packets being *lost* as per seqnum mismatch.

Can you please test this out with both patches and let us know?

> Can I just run test_xsk.sh at tools/testing/selftests/bpf/ directory?
> This will be easier than the above for bpf developers. If it does not
> work, I would like to recommend to make it work.
>
yes test_xsk.shis self contained, will update the instructions in there with v4.

Thanks,
/Weqaar
>
> Björn