[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87h7p5nnjo.fsf@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2020 23:56:11 +0100
From: Petr Machata <me@...chata.org>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc: Petr Machata <me@...chata.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
dsahern@...il.com, Po.Liu@....com, toke@...e.dk,
dave.taht@...il.com, edumazet@...gle.com, tahiliani@...k.edu.in,
vtlam@...gle.com, leon@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-next 2/6] lib: Move print_rate() from tc here; modernize
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org> writes:
>> +int print_color_rate(bool use_iec, enum output_type t, enum color_attr color,
>> + const char *key, const char *fmt, unsigned long long rate);
>> +
>> +static inline int print_rate(bool use_iec, enum output_type t,
>> + const char *key, const char *fmt,
>> + unsigned long long rate)
>> +{
>> + return print_color_rate(use_iec, t, COLOR_NONE, key, fmt, rate);
>> +}
>> +
>
> Overall this looks good, but is there any case where color output
> makes sense for this field? If not then why do all the color wrappers.
All the print_X functions in json_print comes with a print_color_X
flavor as well, even the ones where all clients just use the plain
output. (Notably the recently added on_off. Colors were even one of the
arguments in favor of putting that one to json_print, despite nobody
actually using them for on/off.)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists