[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ygnh4kl6klja.fsf@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 09:55:37 +0200
From: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...dia.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<jhs@...atatu.com>, <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, <jiri@...nulli.us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sched: remove redundant 'rtnl_held' argument
On Tue 01 Dec 2020 at 04:52, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 17:12:05 +0200 Vlad Buslov wrote:
>> @@ -2262,7 +2260,7 @@ static int tc_del_tfilter(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *n,
>>
>> if (prio == 0) {
>> tfilter_notify_chain(net, skb, block, q, parent, n,
>> - chain, RTM_DELTFILTER, rtnl_held);
>> + chain, RTM_DELTFILTER);
>> tcf_chain_flush(chain, rtnl_held);
>> err = 0;
>> goto errout;
>
> Hum. This looks off.
Hi Jakub,
Prio==0 means user requests to flush whole chain. In such case rtnl lock
is obtained earlier in tc_del_tfilter():
/* Take rtnl mutex if flushing whole chain, block is shared (no qdisc
* found), qdisc is not unlocked, classifier type is not specified,
* classifier is not unlocked.
*/
if (!prio ||
(q && !(q->ops->cl_ops->flags & QDISC_CLASS_OPS_DOIT_UNLOCKED)) ||
!tcf_proto_is_unlocked(name)) {
rtnl_held = true;
rtnl_lock();
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists