lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201202090147.48af58fd@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.DHCP.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Wed, 2 Dec 2020 09:01:47 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>,
        Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sfp: add debugfs support

On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 08:59:13 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 13:03:18 +0000 Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> > Jakub,
> > 
> > What's your opinion on this patch? It seems to have stalled...  
> 
> Sorry, I think I expected someone to do the obvious questioning..

Ah, no! I know what happened... Check out patchwork:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/E1khJyS-0003UU-9O@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk/

It says the patch did not apply cleanly to net-next ;)

Regardless let's hear what people thing about using ext_link (or
similar) for the SFP signals.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ