[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201202090147.48af58fd@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.DHCP.thefacebook.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 09:01:47 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>,
Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sfp: add debugfs support
On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 08:59:13 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 13:03:18 +0000 Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> > Jakub,
> >
> > What's your opinion on this patch? It seems to have stalled...
>
> Sorry, I think I expected someone to do the obvious questioning..
Ah, no! I know what happened... Check out patchwork:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/E1khJyS-0003UU-9O@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk/
It says the patch did not apply cleanly to net-next ;)
Regardless let's hear what people thing about using ext_link (or
similar) for the SFP signals.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists