netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sfp: add debugfs support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 7 Dec 2020 16:06:01 +0000
From:   Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>,
        Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sfp: add debugfs support

On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 09:01:47AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 08:59:13 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 13:03:18 +0000 Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> > > Jakub,
> > > 
> > > What's your opinion on this patch? It seems to have stalled...  
> > 
> > Sorry, I think I expected someone to do the obvious questioning..
> 
> Ah, no! I know what happened... Check out patchwork:
> 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/E1khJyS-0003UU-9O@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk/
> 
> It says the patch did not apply cleanly to net-next ;)
> 
> Regardless let's hear what people thing about using ext_link (or
> similar) for the SFP signals.

There seems to have been no replies... I think I'll resend with
Andrew's r-b tag. If something better comes along in the future, we
can always change it - debugfs isn't an API.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!