netdev - Re: [pull request][net-next 00/15] mlx5 updates 2020-12-01

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201202112059.0f9f7475@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.DHCP.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Wed, 2 Dec 2020 11:20:59 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [pull request][net-next 00/15] mlx5 updates 2020-12-01

On Wed, 02 Dec 2020 11:17:16 -0800 Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-12-02 at 10:48 -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 14:41:53 -0800 Saeed Mahameed wrote:  
> > > Please note that the series starts with a merge of mlx5-next
> > > branch,
> > > to resolve and avoid dependency with rdma tree.  
> > 
> > Why is that not a separate posting prior to this one?  
> 
> you mean this ? 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rdma/cover/20201120230339.651609-1-saeedm@nvidia.com/
> 
> it was posted and we discussed it.

Yeah but that's not a pull request, I can't pull that.

> > The patches as posted on the ML fail to build.  
> 
> Well, you need to pull the whole thing :/ .. 
> this is how i used to work with Dave on the mlx5-next branch.

To be clear - I'm asking you to send a PR for the pre-reqs and then
send the ethernet patches. So that the pre-reqs are in the tree already
by the time the ethernet patches hit the ML. I thought that's what you
did in the past, but either way it'd make my life easier.