netdev - Re: VRF NS for lladdr sent on the wrong interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201203130109.GA26743@vmserver>
Date:   Thu, 3 Dec 2020 08:01:09 -0500
From:   Stephen Suryaputra <ssuryaextr@...il.com>
To:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: VRF NS for lladdr sent on the wrong interface

On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 06:06:53PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> >>
> >> With your patch does ping from both hosts work?
> > 
> > Yes, it does.
> > 
> >> What about all of the tests in
> >> tools/testing/selftests/net/fcnal-test.sh? specifically curious about
> >> the 'LLA to GUA' tests (link local to global). Perhaps those tests need
> >> a second interface (e.g., a dummy) that is brought up first to cause the
> >> ordering to be different.
> > 
> > The script needs nettest to be in the path...
> > 
> 
> nettest is in the same directory. Build it and then run the script -
> with your patch applied. We need to see if it affects existing tests.

The tests in fcnal-test.sh passed. There are two failures that are
expected, I think. Attached is the output.

If you agree that my patch is the right solution, I can send the patch
out for review.

Thanks,
Stephen.

View attachment "fcnal-test-output.txt" of type "text/plain" (66030 bytes)