lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 10:32:44 -0800 From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> To: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] bpf: expose bpf_{s,g}etsockopt helpers to bind{4,6} hooks On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 09:25:13AM -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote: > This might be useful for the listener sockets to pre-populate > some options. Since those helpers require locked sockets, > I'm changing bind hooks to lock/unlock the sockets. This > should not cause any performance overhead because at this > point there shouldn't be any socket lock contention and the > locking/unlocking should be cheap. > > Also, as part of the series, I convert test_sock_addr bpf > assembly into C (and preserve the narrow load tests) to > make it easier to extend with th bpf_setsockopt later on. > > v2: > * remove version from bpf programs (Andrii Nakryiko) Applied, Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists