lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 21:55:00 -0800 From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Dongdong Wang <wangdongdong.6@...edance.com>, Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com> Subject: Re: [Patch net] lwt: disable BH too in run_lwt_bpf() On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 10:30 AM Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 10:28 AM Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 10:22 AM Alexei Starovoitov > > <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote: > > > > > > I guess my previous comment could be misinterpreted. > > > Cong, > > > please respin with changing preempt_disable to migrate_disable > > > and adding local_bh_disable. > > > > I have no objection, just want to point out migrate_disable() may > > not exist if we backport this further to -stable, this helper was > > introduced in Feb 2020. > > I see. Then please split it into two patches for ease of backporting. You mean the first patch does the same as this patch and the second patch replaces preempt_disable() with migrate_disable(). Right? Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists