lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 18:22:06 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> To: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>, Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>, Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Thomas Davis <tadavis@....gov>, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bonding: set xfrm feature flags more sanely On Sat, 5 Dec 2020 12:40:03 -0500 Jarod Wilson wrote: > We can remove one of the ifdef blocks here, and instead of setting both > the xfrm hw_features and features flags, then unsetting the the features > flags if not in AB, wait to set the features flags if we're actually in AB > mode. > > Cc: Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com> > Cc: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com> > Cc: Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net> > Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net> > Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> > Cc: Thomas Davis <tadavis@....gov> > Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com> Applied, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists