lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201207182206.572acfaf@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.DHCP.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Dec 2020 18:22:06 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
        Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>,
        Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Thomas Davis <tadavis@....gov>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bonding: set xfrm feature flags more sanely

On Sat,  5 Dec 2020 12:40:03 -0500 Jarod Wilson wrote:
> We can remove one of the ifdef blocks here, and instead of setting both
> the xfrm hw_features and features flags, then unsetting the the features
> flags if not in AB, wait to set the features flags if we're actually in AB
> mode.
> 
> Cc: Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>
> Cc: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>
> Cc: Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> Cc: Thomas Davis <tadavis@....gov>
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>

Applied, thanks!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ