[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzY_497=xXkfok4WFsMRRrC94Q6WwdUWZA_HezXaTtb5GQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 11:55:36 -0800
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch bpf-next 0/3] bpf: introduce timeout map
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 2:28 AM Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> wrote:
>
> From: Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>
>
> This patchset introduces a new bpf hash map which has timeout.
> Patch 1 is a preparation, patch 2 is the implementation of timeout
> map, patch 3 contains a test case for timeout map. Please check each
> patch description for more details.
>
> ---
This patch set seems to be breaking existing selftests. Please take a
look ([0]).
Also patch #3 should have a commit message, even if pretty trivial one.
[0] https://travis-ci.com/github/kernel-patches/bpf/builds/207928289
> Cong Wang (3):
> bpf: use index instead of hash for map_locked[]
> bpf: introduce timeout map
> tools: add a test case for bpf timeout map
>
> include/linux/bpf_types.h | 1 +
> include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 3 +-
> kernel/bpf/hashtab.c | 296 +++++++++++++++++++++---
> kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 3 +-
> tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 1 +
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c | 41 ++++
> 6 files changed, 314 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists