[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 14:25:22 -0800
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc: Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch bpf-next 0/3] bpf: introduce timeout map
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 11:55 AM Andrii Nakryiko
<andrii.nakryiko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 2:28 AM Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>
> >
> > This patchset introduces a new bpf hash map which has timeout.
> > Patch 1 is a preparation, patch 2 is the implementation of timeout
> > map, patch 3 contains a test case for timeout map. Please check each
> > patch description for more details.
> >
> > ---
>
> This patch set seems to be breaking existing selftests. Please take a
> look ([0]).
Interesting, looks unrelated to my patches but let me double check.
> Also patch #3 should have a commit message, even if pretty trivial one.
Yeah, I thought its subject is sufficient for a trivial patch.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists