lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 14:08:48 +0200 From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com> To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>, david.m.ertman@...el.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com, kiran.patil@...el.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [net-next v3 00/14] Add mlx5 subfunction support On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 12:25:18PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 22:12:11 -0800 Saeed Mahameed wrote: > > Hi Dave, Jakub, Jason, > > > > This series form Parav was the theme of this mlx5 release cycle, > > we've been waiting anxiously for the auxbus infrastructure to make it into > > the kernel, and now as the auxbus is in and all the stars are aligned, I > > can finally submit this V2 of the devlink and mlx5 subfunction support. > > > > Subfunctions came to solve the scaling issue of virtualization > > and switchdev environments, where SRIOV failed to deliver and users ran > > out of VFs very quickly as SRIOV demands huge amount of physical resources > > in both of the servers and the NIC. > > > > Subfunction provide the same functionality as SRIOV but in a very > > lightweight manner, please see the thorough and detailed > > documentation from Parav below, in the commit messages and the > > Networking documentation patches at the end of this series. > > > > Sending V2/V3 as a continuation to V1 that was sent Last month [0], > > [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rdma/20201112192424.2742-1-parav@nvidia.com/ > > This adds more and more instances of the 32 bit build warning. > > The warning was also reported separately on netdev after the recent > mlx5-next pull. > > Please address that first (or did you already do and I missed it > somehow?) Hi Jakub, I posted a fix from Parav, https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20201213120641.216032-1-leon@kernel.org/T/#u Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists