lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 14 Dec 2020 03:25:52 +0000
From:   Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>
To:     Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC:     Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>,
        "Sridhar Samudrala" <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>,
        "david.m.ertman@...el.com" <david.m.ertman@...el.com>,
        "dan.j.williams@...el.com" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        "kiran.patil@...el.com" <kiran.patil@...el.com>,
        "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: RE: [net-next v3 00/14] Add mlx5 subfunction support


> From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
> Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2020 5:39 PM
> 
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 12:25:18PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 22:12:11 -0800 Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> > > Hi Dave, Jakub, Jason,
> > >
> > > This series form Parav was the theme of this mlx5 release cycle,
> > > we've been waiting anxiously for the auxbus infrastructure to make
> > > it into the kernel, and now as the auxbus is in and all the stars
> > > are aligned, I can finally submit this V2 of the devlink and mlx5
> subfunction support.
> > >
> > > Subfunctions came to solve the scaling issue of virtualization and
> > > switchdev environments, where SRIOV failed to deliver and users ran
> > > out of VFs very quickly as SRIOV demands huge amount of physical
> > > resources in both of the servers and the NIC.
> > >
> > > Subfunction provide the same functionality as SRIOV but in a very
> > > lightweight manner, please see the thorough and detailed
> > > documentation from Parav below, in the commit messages and the
> > > Networking documentation patches at the end of this series.
> > >
> > > Sending V2/V3 as a continuation to V1 that was sent Last month [0],
> > > [0]
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rdma/20201112192424.2742-1-parav@nvidi
> > > a.com/
> >
> > This adds more and more instances of the 32 bit build warning.
> >
> > The warning was also reported separately on netdev after the recent
> > mlx5-next pull.
> >
> > Please address that first (or did you already do and I missed it
> > somehow?)
> 
> Hi Jakub,
> 
> I posted a fix from Parav,
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20201213120641.216032-1-
> leon@...nel.org/T/#u
> 
> Thanks

Hi Jakub,
This patchset is not added the original warning. Warning got added due to a commit [1].
Its not related to subfunction.
It will be fixed regardless of this patchset as posted in [2].

[1] 2a2970891647 ("net/mlx5: Add sample offload hardware bits and structures")
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20201213123620.GC5005@unreal/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ