lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 18:15:48 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> To: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: don't set non-existing learn2all bit for 6220/6250 On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 12:06:44 +0100 Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > The 6220 and 6250 switches do not have a learn2all bit in global1, ATU > control register; bit 3 is reserverd. > > On the switches that do have that bit, it is used to control whether > learning frames are sent out the ports that have the message_port bit > set. So rather than adding yet another chip method, use the existence > of the ->port_setup_message_port method as a proxy for determining > whether the learn2all bit exists (and should be set). > > Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk> Applied.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists