netdev - Re: Re: [PATCH] enic: Remove redundant free in enic_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53493c26.15.176943fe01d.Coremail.dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn>
Date:   Thu, 24 Dec 2020 18:16:22 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
From:   dinghao.liu@....edu.cn
To:     "Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     kjlu@....edu, "Christian Benvenuti" <benve@...co.com>,
        "Govindarajulu Varadarajan" <_govind@....com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] enic: Remove redundant free in enic_set_ringparam

> On Wed, 23 Dec 2020 20:38:33 +0800 Dinghao Liu wrote:
> > The error handling paths in enic_alloc_vnic_resources()
> > have called enic_free_vnic_resources() before returning.
> > So we may not need to call it again on failure at caller
> > side.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@....edu.cn>
> 
> But it's harmless, right? So the patch is just a cleanup not a fix?
> 

I think it's harmless. Since there is a check every time before freeing,
calling enic_free_vnic_resources() twice has no security issue.

> In that case, could you please repost in two weeks? We're currently 
> in the merge window period, we're only accepting fixes to the
> networking trees.
> 
> Thanks!