netdev - [RFC PATCH v3 03/12] skbuff: Push status and refcounts into sock_zerocopy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201230191244.610449-4-jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 30 Dec 2020 11:12:35 -0800
From:   Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>
To:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
        <edumazet@...gle.com>, <dsahern@...il.com>
CC:     <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 03/12] skbuff: Push status and refcounts into sock_zerocopy_callback

From: Jonathan Lemon <bsd@...com>

Before this change, the caller of sock_zerocopy_callback would
need to save the zerocopy status, decrement and check the refcount,
and then call the callback function - the callback was only invoked
when the refcount reached zero.

Now, the caller just passes the status into the callback function,
which saves the status and handles its own refcounts.

This makes the behavior of the sock_zerocopy_callback identical
to the tpacket and vhost callbacks.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>
---
 include/linux/skbuff.h |  3 ---
 net/core/skbuff.c      | 14 +++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
index 3ca8d7c7b30c..52e96c35f5af 100644
--- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
+++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
@@ -1479,9 +1479,6 @@ static inline void skb_zcopy_clear(struct sk_buff *skb, bool zerocopy)
 	if (uarg) {
 		if (skb_zcopy_is_nouarg(skb)) {
 			/* no notification callback */
-		} else if (uarg->callback == sock_zerocopy_callback) {
-			uarg->zerocopy = uarg->zerocopy && zerocopy;
-			sock_zerocopy_put(uarg);
 		} else {
 			uarg->callback(uarg, zerocopy);
 		}
diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index d88963f47f7d..8c18940723ff 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -1194,7 +1194,7 @@ static bool skb_zerocopy_notify_extend(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 lo, u16 len)
 	return true;
 }
 
-void sock_zerocopy_callback(struct ubuf_info *uarg, bool success)
+static void __sock_zerocopy_callback(struct ubuf_info *uarg)
 {
 	struct sk_buff *tail, *skb = skb_from_uarg(uarg);
 	struct sock_exterr_skb *serr;
@@ -1222,7 +1222,7 @@ void sock_zerocopy_callback(struct ubuf_info *uarg, bool success)
 	serr->ee.ee_origin = SO_EE_ORIGIN_ZEROCOPY;
 	serr->ee.ee_data = hi;
 	serr->ee.ee_info = lo;
-	if (!success)
+	if (!uarg->zerocopy)
 		serr->ee.ee_code |= SO_EE_CODE_ZEROCOPY_COPIED;
 
 	q = &sk->sk_error_queue;
@@ -1241,11 +1241,19 @@ void sock_zerocopy_callback(struct ubuf_info *uarg, bool success)
 	consume_skb(skb);
 	sock_put(sk);
 }
+
+void sock_zerocopy_callback(struct ubuf_info *uarg, bool success)
+{
+	uarg->zerocopy = uarg->zerocopy & success;
+
+	if (refcount_dec_and_test(&uarg->refcnt))
+		__sock_zerocopy_callback(uarg);
+}
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sock_zerocopy_callback);
 
 void sock_zerocopy_put(struct ubuf_info *uarg)
 {
-	if (uarg && refcount_dec_and_test(&uarg->refcnt))
+	if (uarg)
 		uarg->callback(uarg, uarg->zerocopy);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sock_zerocopy_put);
-- 
2.24.1