[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201230191240.GX1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 19:12:40 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>
Cc: Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] net: sfp: allow to use also SFP modules which are
detected as SFF
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 06:27:07PM +0100, Marek Behún wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Dec 2020 18:06:52 +0100
> Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > if (!sfp->type->module_supported(&id) &&
> > (memcmp(id.base.vendor_name, "UBNT ", 16) ||
> > memcmp(id.base.vendor_pn, "UF-INSTANT ", 16)))
>
> I would rather add a quirk member (bitfield) to the sfp structure and do
> something like this
>
> if (!sfp->type->module_supported(&id) &&
> !(sfp->quirks & SFP_QUIRK_BAD_PHYS_ID))
>
> or maybe put this check into the module_supported method.
Sorry, definitely not. If you've ever looked at the SDHCI driver with
its multiple "quirks" bitfields, doing this is a recipe for creating
a very horrid hard to understand mess.
What you suggest just results in yet more complexity.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists