[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <X+y2NZ4LFy31aZ6M@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 18:17:41 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] net: sfp: assume that LOS is not implemented if both
LOS normal and inverted is set
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 05:06:23PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 05:57:58PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Wednesday 30 December 2020 16:13:10 Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 04:47:54PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > Some GPON SFP modules (e.g. Ubiquiti U-Fiber Instant) have set both
> > > > SFP_OPTIONS_LOS_INVERTED and SFP_OPTIONS_LOS_NORMAL bits in their EEPROM.
> > > >
> > > > Such combination of bits is meaningless so assume that LOS signal is not
> > > > implemented.
> > > >
> > > > This patch fixes link carrier for GPON SFP module Ubiquiti U-Fiber Instant.
> > > >
> > > > Co-developed-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
> > >
> > > No, this is not co-developed. The patch content is exactly what _I_
> > > sent you, only the commit description is your own.
> >
> > Sorry, in this case I misunderstood usage of this Co-developed-by tag.
> > I will remove it in next iteration of patches.
>
> You need to mark me as the author of the code at the very least...
Hi Pali
You also need to keep your own Signed-off-by, since the patch is
coming through you.
So basically, git commit --am --author="Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>"
and then two Signed-off-by: lines.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists