[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHsH6Gu+jCWud1VTh_jJmg0Z-nb4e0ayzTpitrz6inuiEfcWtA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 19:50:49 +0200
From: Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@...il.com>
To: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Cc: herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC ipsec-next] xfrm: interface: enable TSO on xfrm interfaces
Hi Steffen,
On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 10:44 AM Steffen Klassert
<steffen.klassert@...unet.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 09:15:38AM +0200, Eyal Birger wrote:
> > Underlying xfrm output supports gso packets.
> > Declare support in hw_features and adapt the xmit MTU check to pass GSO
> > packets.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@...il.com>
>
> Looks ok to me.
Great, Thanks for the review.
Should I submit a non-rfc patch once the merge window opens?
Eyal.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists