netdev - Re: [RFC ipsec-next] xfrm: interface: enable TSO on xfrm interfaces

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210105081246.GK3576117@gauss3.secunet.de>
Date:   Tue, 5 Jan 2021 09:12:46 +0100
From:   Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To:     Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@...il.com>
CC:     <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC ipsec-next] xfrm: interface: enable TSO on xfrm interfaces

On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 07:50:49PM +0200, Eyal Birger wrote:
> Hi Steffen,
> 
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 10:44 AM Steffen Klassert
> <steffen.klassert@...unet.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 09:15:38AM +0200, Eyal Birger wrote:
> > > Underlying xfrm output supports gso packets.
> > > Declare support in hw_features and adapt the xmit MTU check to pass GSO
> > > packets.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@...il.com>
> >
> > Looks ok to me.
> 
> Great, Thanks for the review.
> 
>  Should I submit a non-rfc patch once the merge window opens?

Yes, please do so.